Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical vs Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical if
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.5 m vs 0.58 m
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 12 aperture blades vs 10
Pick the Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 134 g lighter (170 g vs 304 g)
- You want a compact lens: 28.1 mm vs 58.1 mm long
Spec differences
7 differences| APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical | Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight |
304 g
|
170 g
lighter
|
| Length |
58.1 mm
|
28.1 mm
shorter
|
| Diameter |
55.6 mm
|
52 mm
slimmer
|
| Filter thread |
49 mm
|
39 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.5 m
closer
|
0.58 m
|
| Aperture blades |
12
more blades
|
10
|
| Optical design |
11 elements / 9 groups
|
8 elements / 5 groups
|
7 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, type, focal length, max aperture, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Voigtlander both
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Max aperture
- f/2 both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical: 206 g lighter, more blades
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical: 340 g lighter
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
64 g lighter vs focuses closer
Zeiss Biogon T* 35mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical: 70 g lighter, focuses closer
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Voigtlander APO-Lanthar 35mm F2 Aspherical
7artisans 35mm f/1.7: ½ stop faster
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Voigtlander Ultron Vintage Line 35mm F2 Aspherical
7artisans 35mm f/1.7: ½ stop faster