Browse

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Tokina AT-X 400mm f/5.6

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM is faster by 2 stops (f/2.8 vs f/5.6), letting in more light.
  • Tokina AT-X 400mm f/5.6 is lighter by 4380g.
Specification comparison
Spec EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM AT-X 400mm f/5.6
Brand Canon Tokina
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Telephoto Telephoto
Focal length 400mm 400mm
Max aperture f/2.8 (faster) f/5.6
Released 1999 n/a
Blades 8 8
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 13 8
Af motor USM n/a
Elements 17 10
Weight g 5370.0 990 (lighter)
Length mm 349.0 202.0
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 163.0 79.0
Min focus m 3.0 2.5 (closer focusing)
Max magnification 0.15 0.17
Filter mm n/a 72

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM

The 1999 first stabilized version of Canon's 400mm f/2.8, a staple for pro sports and wildlife shooters. Later II and III models reduced the weight.

Pros

  • f/2.8 aperture with IS
  • Weather-sealed L build
  • Fast USM focusing
  • Takes Canon extenders

Cons

  • About 5.4kg
  • Older IS generation
  • Heavier than the II and III

Tokina AT-X 400mm f/5.6

Tokina AT-X 400mm f/5.6: a telephoto prime lens with a 400mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/5.6, made for Canon EF mount cameras. It brings distant subjects closer for sports, wildlife and events.

More comparisons for Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.