Browse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8 is faster by 1.3 stops (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), letting in more light.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8 is lighter by 246g.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro goes wider (12mm vs 25mm).
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro reaches further (40mm vs 25mm).
Specification comparison
Spec M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8
Brand Olympus Olympus
Mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Type Zoom Prime
Focal length 12-40mm (wider) 25mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/1.8 (faster)
Weight g 382 136 (lighter)
Filter mm 62 46
Length mm 84.0 41.0
Diameter mm 70.0 56.0
Min focus m 0.2 (closer focusing) 0.24

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Olympus's weather-sealed 24-80mm-equivalent standard zoom for Micro Four Thirds with a constant f/2.8 aperture. It weighs about 382 g and takes 62mm filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Dust, splash and freeze resistant build
  • Manual-focus clutch ring
  • Compact and light for an f/2.8 zoom

Cons

  • No built-in stabilization (relies on the camera)
  • Larger than the f/4 12-100mm alternatives

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8

A compact 50mm-equivalent prime for Micro Four Thirds. It weighs about 136 g, takes 46mm filters and focuses as close as 0.24 m.

Pros

  • f/1.8
  • Light at about 136 g
  • Fast, quiet autofocus
  • Manual-focus clutch ring

Cons

  • Not weather sealed
  • No stabilization (camera-based only)

More comparisons for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.