Browse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is lighter by 196g.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro goes wider (12mm vs 60mm).
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro reaches further (60mm vs 40mm).
Specification comparison
Spec M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Brand Olympus Olympus
Mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Type Zoom Macro
Focal length 12-40mm (wider) 60mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Weight g 382 186 (lighter)
Filter mm 62 46
Length mm 84.0 82.0
Diameter mm 70.0 56.0
Min focus m 0.2 0.19 (closer focusing)

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Olympus's weather-sealed 24-80mm-equivalent standard zoom for Micro Four Thirds with a constant f/2.8 aperture. It weighs about 382 g and takes 62mm filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Dust, splash and freeze resistant build
  • Manual-focus clutch ring
  • Compact and light for an f/2.8 zoom

Cons

  • No built-in stabilization (relies on the camera)
  • Larger than the f/4 12-100mm alternatives

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro

A 1:1 macro for Micro Four Thirds that is equivalent to a 120mm lens on full frame. It weighs about 186 g, takes 46mm filters and is dust and splash resistant.

Pros

  • True 1:1 magnification
  • Splash and dust resistant
  • Light at about 186 g
  • Focus limiter switch

Cons

  • No built-in stabilization
  • f/2.8 aperture

More comparisons for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm F2.8 Pro

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.