Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED vs Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM
Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.
Verdict at a glance
- Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM goes wider (18mm vs 24mm).
- Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM reaches further (200mm vs 120mm).
| Spec | AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED | 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Nikon | Sigma |
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon F |
| Type | Superzoom | Superzoom |
| Focal length | 24-120mm | 18-200mm (wider) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Released | 2003 | n/a |
| Format | full-frame | n/a |
| Groups | 13 | n/a |
| Af motor | SWM | n/a |
| Elements | 15 | n/a |
| Weight g | 575.0 | n/a |
| Filter mm | 72 | n/a |
| Length mm | 94.0 | n/a |
| Stabilized | Yes | n/a |
| Diameter mm | 77.0 | n/a |
| Min focus m | 0.5 | n/a |
Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED
Nikon's FX zoom with VR and a 72mm filter thread, introduced in 2003. The 24-120mm f/4G ED VR succeeded it.
Pros
- Wide range
- VR
- Silent Wave Motor
- Lighter than its f/4 successor
Cons
- Slow aperture
- Soft at 120mm
- Distortion at 24mm
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM: an APS-C superzoom lens with a 18-200mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/3.5-6.3, made for Nikon F mount cameras, with Optical Stabilizer and Hyper Sonic Motor autofocus. A high-ratio walk-around zoom for APS-C cameras.
More comparisons for Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED
- Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED vs Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD
- Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED vs Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM
- Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED vs Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Macro
- Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED vs Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom