Browse

Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED vs Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED goes wider (24mm vs 75mm).
  • Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom reaches further (205mm vs 120mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom
Brand Nikon Vivitar
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Superzoom Telephoto Zoom
Focal length 24-120mm (wider) 75-205mm
Max aperture f/3.5 (faster) f/3.8
Released 2003 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 13 n/a
Af motor SWM n/a
Elements 15 n/a
Weight g 575.0 n/a
Filter mm 72 n/a
Length mm 94.0 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 77.0 n/a
Min focus m 0.5 n/a

Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED

Nikon's FX zoom with VR and a 72mm filter thread, introduced in 2003. The 24-120mm f/4G ED VR succeeded it.

Pros

  • Wide range
  • VR
  • Silent Wave Motor
  • Lighter than its f/4 successor

Cons

  • Slow aperture
  • Soft at 120mm
  • Distortion at 24mm

Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom

A 75-205mm f/3.8 telephoto zoom lens, the Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom is designed for Nikon F mount bodies. The range suits sports, wildlife, events and portraits.

More comparisons for Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.